dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06181
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:39:08PM +0100, Dag Lindbo wrote:
> >
> > Why do you need to evaluate functions at arbitrary points?
> >
> > I can understand it's nice to be able to do this, but in many cases
> > there are other solutions (which are much more efficient).
> >
>
> I think there is general interest in being able to compute line integrals
> over a computed solution. It is natural to use the finite elements as
> interpolant to get values at quadrature points. Any thoughts?
>
> Dag
Sure, this is something we are also looking at implementing, hopefully
before the summer.
--
Anders
References
-
Re: How to deal with two subdomains with different PDE parameters
From: Anders Logg, 2008-02-11
-
Re: How to deal with two subdomains with different PDE parameters
From: Matthew Knepley, 2008-02-11
-
Re: How to deal with two subdomains with different PDE parameters
From: Matthew Knepley, 2008-02-11
-
Re: How to deal with two subdomains with different PDE parameters
From: Anders Logg, 2008-02-12
-
Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Kristen Kaasbjerg, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Shilpa Khatri, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Johan Jansson, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Dag Lindbo, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Anders Logg, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Dag Lindbo, 2008-02-13