dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06183
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:43:40PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> Quoting Dag Lindbo <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > >
> > > Why do you need to evaluate functions at arbitrary points?
> > >
> > > I can understand it's nice to be able to do this, but in many cases
> > > there are other solutions (which are much more efficient).
> > >
> >
> > I think there is general interest in being able to compute line integrals
> > over a computed solution. It is natural to use the finite elements as
> > interpolant to get values at quadrature points. Any thoughts?
>
> If you just want the values at quadrature points, you can project the solution
> (Function) onto a QuadratureElement.
>
> Kristian
I guess the quadrature points are given by some other entity (like an
edge) intersecting a cell so they wouldn't fit.
--
Anders
Follow ups
References
-
Re: How to deal with two subdomains with different PDE parameters
From: Matthew Knepley, 2008-02-11
-
Re: How to deal with two subdomains with different PDE parameters
From: Matthew Knepley, 2008-02-11
-
Re: How to deal with two subdomains with different PDE parameters
From: Anders Logg, 2008-02-12
-
Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Kristen Kaasbjerg, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Shilpa Khatri, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Johan Jansson, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Dag Lindbo, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Anders Logg, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Dag Lindbo, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Kristian Oelgaard, 2008-02-13