dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06451
Re: python assembly problem, STL
Anders Logg skrev den 10/03-2008 følgende:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:57:15PM +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> > 2008/3/10, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 04:02:33PM +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> > > > 2008/3/3, Ola Skavhaug <skavhaug@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > > so perhaps the assembler doesn't know what to do. Is there a way of sending
> > > > > the correct functions (concrete cpp_Functions, for instance) to the assembler?
> > > >
> > > > assemble(..., coefficients=[...])
> > > > but the coefficients list must then include all coefficient functions
> > > > (in order).
> > > >
> > > > Or use the Assembler class directly.
> > >
> > >
> > > It looks to me like you are using FFC forms. Then you don't need to
> > > send any coefficients. All functions that appear in the form will be
> > > extracted and then sent to the (C++) assembler automatically.
> >
> > But have you implemented this for Functions(mixed_element)?
>
> No.
>
> > Looks to me like that's what didn't work in Olas code.
>
> I don't think Functions() is needed at all. If element = A + B, then
> it's enough to do
>
> f = Function(A, mesh, ...)
> g = Function(B, mesh, ...)
Which is exactly what I did...
Ola
> --
> Anders
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Follow ups
References
-
python assembly problem, STL
From: Ola Skavhaug, 2008-03-03
-
Re: python assembly problem, STL
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2008-03-10
-
Re: python assembly problem, STL
From: Anders Logg, 2008-03-10
-
Re: python assembly problem, STL
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2008-03-10
-
Re: python assembly problem, STL
From: Anders Logg, 2008-03-10