dolfin team mailing list archive

["Dag Lindbo" <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 2008/3/10, Andy Ray Terrel <aterrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> I was going back and updating some older code and I found an undesirable
>>  vector interface change for some of my code.   It use to be that Vector
>>  was just a typedef to the particular vector that was installed (either
>>  PETSc or uBlas), and the '+' and '*' operator was overloaded in each of
>>  these. Now it looks like there is some attempts at making a smarter
>>  wrapper and the '+' and '*' operators are no longer overloaded for the
>>  Vector Class.  For example the code below works if you replace Vector
>>  with either PETScVector or uBlasVector, but not as is.  Is this the way
>>  the current implementation is meant to be, a bug, or am I missing
>>  something obvious here?
>
> It's just not added to the new interfaces yet.
>

Sacrificing a bit of beauty, one can do

iter.vec() = test.vec() + 2*one.vec();

This should work for both uBLAS or PETSc, right?

/Dag