← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: Plans

 



Anders Logg wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:03:52PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:34:36PM +0100, Åsmund Ødegård wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 04:34:40PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
 > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:12:17PM +0100, johannr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
 > > On Tue, February 19, 2008 Anders Logg wrote:
 > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:18:01AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
 > > >>
 > > >>
 > > >> Ola Skavhaug wrote:
 > > >> > Johannes Ring skrev den 19/02-2008 følgende:
 > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 18, Anders Logg wrote:
 > > >> >>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:33:40PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
 > > >> >>>> This is good juncture at which re-focus on important goals for a
 > > >> >>>> hopefully not too distant next release. Three priorities that I see
 > > >> are:
 > > >> >>>>
 > > >> >>>> - New build system.
 > > >> >>> I think Johannes (http://simula.no/portal_memberdata/johannr) has
 > > >> >>> started looking at this.
 > > >> >> Unfortunately, I haven't had very much time to look at this lately.
 > > >> >> Hopefully I will get some time later this week so I can start working
 > > >> on
 > > >> >> this (if that is what Ola wants me to do).
 > > >> >
 > > >> > Sure, this is relatively high on the priority list. As a nice side
 > > >> effect, you
 > > >> > will become an expert SCons user, useful in lots of other projects :)
 > > >> >
 > > >>
 > > >> Give that a release has just been made, this could be a good moment to
 > > >> bite the bullet and implement the new build system in dolfin-dev, and
 > > >> accept that things will be broken for a little while. It would be good
 > > >> to have the build system largely sorted out before getting stuck into
 > > >> parallelisation.
 > > >>
 > > >> Garth
 > > >
 > > > Yes, it's the only way to get it tested. As long as the scons-based
 > > > DOLFIN is in a separate repository, it will be ignored by everyone.
 > > >
 > > > So let's break things as quickly as possible so we can fix them.
 > > >
 > > > Johannes, tell us as soon as you have something that "works" (for
 > > > you). Then everyone can take a quick look and if there are no
 > > > objections we push it to the main repository and work from there.
 > >
 > > The SCons build system for DOLFIN should be in a more or less "working"
 > > state right now. I have updated the instructions at
 > > http://www.fenics.org/wiki/Compiling_DOLFIN_with_SCons
 > >
 > > Please, have a go!
 >
 > Very nice! (I haven't checked it yet but I assume it is...)
 >
 > I suggest we set a deadline for next Friday (March 14) for comments on
 > the new build system. So let's everyone try it out and see if it
 > works. If there are no major objections, we'll push this to dolfin-dev
 > next Friday.

 I get the following error when running scons:

 scons: Reading SConscript files ...
 AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'defaultPythonLib':
  File "/scratch/src/dolfin/dolfin-scons/SConstruct", line 50:
    scons.defaultPythonLib(prefix="$prefix")),
Try hg pull/update and show me the output of 'scons' (there should be
some debug-print towards the top).

Åsmund
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/simula_scons/__init__.pyc
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'defaultPythonLib':
  File "/scratch/src/dolfin/dolfin-scons/SConstruct", line 52:
    scons.defaultPythonLib(prefix="$prefix")),

ok, I see now what the problem is. I do have an old version of
simula_scons.


Where was the old version installed? I have the same error but I can't find the old files.

Garth


Follow ups

References