dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

johannr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 Johannes Ring wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > johannr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > > > On a side note, when compiling with PETSc, g++ is being used instead
> > > > > of
> > > > > mpicxx. Shouldn't it be mpicxx if that's what PETsc used?
> > > > Yes, it should use the compiler that PETSc was compiled with. What does
> > > > the petsc.pc file say? What does 'pkg-config dolfin
> > > > --variable=compiler'
> > > > say?
> > > petsc.pc says mpicxx
> > >
> > > dolfin.pc says g++, and 'pkg-config dolfin --variable=compiler' returns
> > > 'g++'
> > I'm sorry, I meant 'pkg-config petsc --variable=compiler'. It should of
> > course return 'mpicxx'.

Yes, it does.

Garth

> > > I do get the below output from scons.
> > >
> > > Garth
> > >
> > >   Trying to generate pkg-config file for petsc... Does not know about
> > > any alternates for mpicxx, so that is used
> > > Does not know about any alternates for mpicxx, so that is used
> > > Does not know about any alternates for mpicxx, so that is used
> > > Does not know about any alternates for mpicxx, so that is used
> > > Does not know about any alternates for mpicxx, so that is used
> > > Does not know about any alternates for mpicxx, so that is used
> > > Does not know about any alternates for mpicxx, so that is used
> > > Does not know about any alternates for mpicxx, so that is used
> > > done
> > Strange. Need to look into that.
>
> I think this is okay in this case. The output should be changed though.
>
> Johannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev