dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

Anders Logg wrote:
> I have made some further adjustments to the assembly benchmark in
>
>   bench/fem/assembly/cpp
>
> The results are here:
>
>   http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin?f=82bebeaa545c;file=bench/fem/assembly/cpp/bench.log
>
> Before trying to conclude anything from the results, please run the
> benchmark and report your results. There may still be bugs. Please take
> a look at the benchmark code as well, it's fairly short. It would be
> good if we could settle on a fixed benchmark that we all trust and
> then continue to discuss what to do about improving the numbers.

My results are quite different, so perhaps we could post results with 
machine details, compiler options, etc, to the wiki?

Garth

> The benchmark code is here:
>
>   http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin?f=1378b25bf84b;file=bench/fem/assembly/cpp/main.cpp
>
> Just to trigger some discussion, Epetra seems to be the worst backend
> in the assembly event, but the clear winner in the reassembly event.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev