dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:30:21PM +0200, Johan Jansson wrote:
> Niclas Jansson wrote:
> > Anders Logg wrote:
> >   
> >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:03:59PM +0200, Niclas Jansson wrote:
> >>     
> >>
> ...
> >>> It's a (ugly) workaround due to the static nature of the MeshEditor
> >>> (number of vertices must be specified a priori). It could of course be
> >>> fixed by moving the geometric partitioner inside the parser, and only
> >>> opening the editor inside closeMesh().
> >>>
> >>> However the nice solution would be to make the MeshEditor more dynamic.
> >>> That would also make life easier when implementing a better refinement
> >>> algorithm (for example, the recursive longest edge bisection (Rivara)
> >>> from unicorn)
> >>>       
> >> I agree it would be better to make MeshEditor dynamic. The problem is
> >> that this is not always needed. Perhaps we should add a new class
> >> DynamicMeshEditor that can be used when one does not know the number
> >> of vertices and cells a priori.
> >>
> >> It could be very simple, just storing the dynamic data in suitable STL
> >> containers and then calling MeshEditor in close().
> >>
> >>     
> This is nice, and definitely needed. I'll take a look at updating the 
> mesh refinement.
> 
>   Johan

ok.

-- 
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature