dolfin team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <hake@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Saturday 17 January 2009 00:41:07 Bartosz Sawicki wrote:
> On 16/01/09 04:11 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:42:30PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
> >> On Friday 16 January 2009 23:25:19 Bartosz Sawicki wrote:
> >>> On 16/01/09 03:14 PM, Johan Hake wrote:
> >>>> On Friday 16 January 2009 23:05:41 Anders Logg wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:34:56PM -0700, Bartosz Sawicki wrote:
> >>>>>> I'm every day user of on-line documentation generated by Doxygen.
> >>>>>> This makes my life much easier.:)
> >>>>>> But I realized that classes for others backends than uBLAS, are
> >>>>>> ignored. This is probably because macro HAS_PETSC is disabled. Would
> >>>>>> it be possible to add "PREDEFINED = HAS_PETSC" to our Doxygen
> >>>>>> configuration file?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BArtek
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Try and see if you can get it to work. I don't know much about
> >>>>> Doxygen (other than the bare minimum needed to set up our current
> >>>>> configuration).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The documentation is generated using
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   scripts/makedoc
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you can find a solution that works, let me know.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am actually on to it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Adding usefull stuff all define has_foo, and removing totally
> >>>> irelevant stuff, as all the forms from elements from the script.
> >>>>
> >>>> Will check in soon.
> >>>
> >>> Awesome !
> >>
> >> Ok, it is now in.
> >>
> >> Looks now quite usefull for me!
> >>
> >> We need to keep this file updated with the proper defines.
> >>
> >> There is probably a hook that will recompile the html documentation at
> >> the web automaticly, but you can also run the script your self, as
> >> explained above.
> >
> > Nice. The manuals are updated each day at 07.10 so it should show up
> > tomorrow.
>
> Yeap. I agree that it looks better, but there is still mess with CSS
> files. Look how it can look (screenshoot in attachment)
>
> It was generated with Doxygen 1.5.6, while on the server we have 1.5.1.
> So there maybe small differences in final result.
>
> My advice is to remove myheader.inc and myheader.inc files and leave
> blank HTML_HEADER and HTML_FOOTER options. Default doxygen setting are
> fine.

Yes, I thought they looked a bit dull.

I just commented out the header, and footer files.

Looks much nicer now!

Johan