dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #12895
Re: matrix action
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 05:11:51PM -0500, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dirichlet BC would need to be added in/after each multiplication and
> it should be possible to build it into the mult() operator and make it
> efficient.
>
>
> I still think the best way to handle this is to eliminate them, as I talked
> about
> last time at Simula.
>
> Matt
I think we're in position to do that now with the new FunctionSpace
class. One could allow restrictions to be imposed, for example
V.restrict(bc);
But I haven't seen any good numbers to indicate it's worth the effort.
How much better is it to eliminate, condition numbers etc for letting
the constrained dofs just sit along?
--
Anders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References
-
matrix action
From: Robert Kirby, 2009-04-04
-
Re: matrix action
From: Garth N. Wells, 2009-04-04
-
Re: matrix action
From: Robert Kirby, 2009-04-04
-
Re: matrix action
From: Johan Hake, 2009-04-04
-
Re: matrix action
From: Robert Kirby, 2009-04-05
-
Re: matrix action
From: Anders Logg, 2009-04-05
-
Re: matrix action
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2009-04-05
-
Re: matrix action
From: Robert Kirby, 2009-04-05
-
Re: matrix action
From: Anders Logg, 2009-04-05
-
Re: matrix action
From: Matthew Knepley, 2009-04-05