dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #12986
Re: pydolfin again
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:26:49AM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:04:33PM -0500, Robert Kirby wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > In addition to my matrix-free technique I'm implementing behind the
> > KrylovMatrix interface, I'm also
> > trying to do a sanity check and build the matrix for comparison.
> >
> > However, there are "set" methods for uBLASSparseMatrix and PETScSparseMatrix
> > (and uBLASDenseMatrix and just Matrix),
> > but not "add" methods in the pydolfin interface. Is this straightforward to
> > add, or is there some issue here?
> >
> > I can always do manual indexing since this is just for comparison (if I'm after
> > performance, I won't use Python anyway),
> > but for research in new methods that aren't ready to automate yet, it can be
> > helpful to have as much of DOLFIN exposed
> > to Python as possible.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rob
>
> I've made an attempt to add add. See if it helps.
This didn't work. I tried to see what's been done for set() in
dolfin_la_{pre,post}.i and did the same for add().
Does anyone know why set() is exposed and not add()? Johan?
--
Anders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References