dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #14236
Re: Python + NewParameter
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 08:04:36PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote:
> On Saturday 04 July 2009 19:53:46 Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 05:30:42PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 12:59:19AM +0200, Johan Hake wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:52:13 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > > > Johan Hake wrote:
> > > > > > On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:14:04 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > > > >> How should the new parameter system be used from the Python
> > > > > >> interface?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looks like you found out of it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, with some trial and error and a search on "__setitem__".
> > > >
> > > > Yes I used __setitem__ for all assignments.
> > > >
> > > > A test is also provided in
> > > >
> > > > sandbox/misc
> > > >
> > > > Should update it to a fullfledged unit test before the release. I see
> > > > that I need to update the PyDOLFIN interface for nested parameter set.
> > > >
> > > > Johan
> > >
> > > I've been working without internet access and have worked on removing
> > > the old parameter system entirely and using the global parameter set
> > > instead of dolfin_get/set.
> > >
> > > I'll try to merge this later tonight and then I suspect there will
> > > need to be some more work on getting this to work in Python.
> >
> > The merge went terribly wrong. We've been editing the same files.
> > I need to reimplement the changes in a fresh clone.
>
> Urk...
>
> I just touched 5 lines! How could it destroy a whole merge?
>
> johan
Garth had 10 or so changesets in between, related to handling of
parameters in Python, linear algebra and demos. I touched some of that
as well, so I might as well redo it.
This is a reminder of the importance of merging early, often, and that
having an internet connection is important when coding... :-)
--
Anders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References