On Thursday 27 August 2009 10:22:06 DOLFIN wrote:
One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository.
A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
changeset: 6857:7cedf9cb8e793c64e69819fcabe3630980e94702
tag: tip
user: "Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>"
date: Thu Aug 27 09:21:55 2009 +0100
files: dolfin/ale/HarmonicSmoothing.cpp
dolfin/fem/SystemAssembler.cpp dolfin/io/RAWFile.cpp
dolfin/io/XMLVector.cpp dolfin/la/EpetraVector.cpp dolfin/la/EpetraVector.h
dolfin/la/GenericMatrix.h dolfin/la/GenericTensor.h
dolfin/la/GenericVector.h dolfin/la/MTL4Vector.cpp dolfin/la/MTL4Vector.h
dolfin/la/PETScVector.cpp dolfin/la/PETScVector.h
dolfin/la/SingularSolver.cpp dolfin/la/Vector.h dolfin/la/uBLASVector.cpp
dolfin/la/uBLASVector.h dolfin/plot/FunctionPlotData.cpp
dolfin/swig/dolfin_la_get_set_items.i description:
Rename GenericVector:get/set/add(double*) to get_local, set_local and
add_local.
Not sure I got this one.
Shouldn't the indices that is constructed by:
(snippet from PETScVector::get_local)
int m = static_cast<int>(size());
int* rows = new int[m];
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
rows[i] = i;
go from local_range().first to local_range().second instead of the indices of
the global vector, when calling this function in parallel?
