dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #15918
Re: [HG DOLFIN] All demos compile.
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 09:00:06PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote:
> On Thursday 01 October 2009 12:54:39 Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:34:47AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:25:16AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > >> Anders Logg wrote:
> > > >>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:37:13AM +0200, DOLFIN wrote:
> > > >>>> One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository.
> > > >>>> A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> changeset: 7205:245f10510e8e
> > > >>>> tag: tip
> > > >>>> user: "Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>"
> > > >>>> date: Thu Oct 01 00:37:03 2009 +0100
> > > >>>> files: demo/function/eval/cpp/main.cpp
> > > >>>> demo/pde/bcs/cpp/main.cpp demo/pde/curl-curl/cpp/main.cpp
> > > >>>> demo/pde/equality/cpp/main.cpp
> > > >>>> demo/pde/nonlinear-poisson/cpp/main.cpp
> > > >>>> demo/pde/periodic/cpp/main.cpp demo/pde/poisson1D/cpp/main.cpp
> > > >>>> demo/pde/simple/cpp/main.cpp demo/pde/stokes/stabilized/cpp/main.cpp
> > > >>>> demo/pde/stokes/taylor-hood/cpp/main.cpp description:
> > > >>>> All demos compile.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Nice!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What else remains on the C++ side?
> > > >>
> > > >> Some testing and perhaps some more clean up. I find the logic around
> > > >> the the interpolate functions in FunctionSpace a bit confusing. Should
> > > >> some of that functionality be moved to Function?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that needs some cleanup. I haven't given it any thought
> > > > though. Perhaps we should put everything into Function? It's confusing
> > > > when calls jump between files.
> > >
> > > Yes, that's what I have trouble with.
> > >
> > > > I think I had some good motivation for it when it was first
> > > > implemented but I don't see the point now.
> > > >
> > > >> It would be nice to get the Python interface working (or at least
> > > >> compiling again).
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but I don't know if that's possible without Hake.
> > >
> > > I was applying some gentle pressure? Your sentence reads like Johan has
> > > vanished - are you still around Johan?
> >
> > He's going away for a few days so he won't be able to fix it until
> > Monday I think.
>
> Yupp!
>
> I was away without Internet for wome days. Back on track now, trying to catch
> up on the emails...
>
> Will try to get things working tomorrow Monday.
Great. We've been missing you. :-)
The base class is now called GenericFunction (not Coefficient), and as
before we now have two subclasses: Function and Expression.
--
Anders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References