dolfin team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <hake@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday 04 October 2009 21:26:58 Anders Logg wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 09:00:06PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 October 2009 12:54:39 Anders Logg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:34:47AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > > Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:25:16AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > > >> Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > >>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:37:13AM +0200, DOLFIN wrote:
> > > > >>>> One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin
> > > > >>>> repository. A short summary of the last three changesets is
> > > > >>>> included below.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> changeset:   7205:245f10510e8e
> > > > >>>> tag:         tip
> > > > >>>> user:        "Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>"
> > > > >>>> date:        Thu Oct 01 00:37:03 2009 +0100
> > > > >>>> files:       demo/function/eval/cpp/main.cpp
> > > > >>>> demo/pde/bcs/cpp/main.cpp demo/pde/curl-curl/cpp/main.cpp
> > > > >>>> demo/pde/equality/cpp/main.cpp
> > > > >>>> demo/pde/nonlinear-poisson/cpp/main.cpp
> > > > >>>> demo/pde/periodic/cpp/main.cpp demo/pde/poisson1D/cpp/main.cpp
> > > > >>>> demo/pde/simple/cpp/main.cpp
> > > > >>>> demo/pde/stokes/stabilized/cpp/main.cpp
> > > > >>>> demo/pde/stokes/taylor-hood/cpp/main.cpp description:
> > > > >>>> All demos compile.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Nice!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> What else remains on the C++ side?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Some testing and perhaps some more clean up. I find the logic
> > > > >> around the the interpolate functions in FunctionSpace a bit
> > > > >> confusing. Should some of that functionality be moved to Function?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, that needs some cleanup. I haven't given it any thought
> > > > > though. Perhaps we should put everything into Function? It's
> > > > > confusing when calls jump between files.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that's what I have trouble with.
> > > >
> > > > > I think I had some good motivation for it when it was first
> > > > > implemented but I don't see the point now.
> > > > >
> > > > >> It would be nice to get the Python interface working (or at least
> > > > >> compiling again).
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, but I don't know if that's possible without Hake.
> > > >
> > > > I was applying some gentle pressure? Your sentence reads like Johan
> > > > has vanished - are you still around Johan?
> > >
> > > He's going away for a few days so he won't be able to fix it until
> > > Monday I think.
> >
> > Yupp!
> >
> > I was away without Internet for wome days. Back on track now, trying to
> > catch up on the emails...
> >
> > Will try to get things working tomorrow Monday.
> 
> Great. We've been missing you. :-)

That's a good feeling! To be missed I mean :)

> The base class is now called GenericFunction (not Coefficient), and as
> before we now have two subclasses: Function and Expression.

Yes I have figured that out. I am through the pile of emails now ;)

Johan

> --
> Anders
>