dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #17631
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Harish Narayanan
<harish.mlists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2/16/10 10:27 AM, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Harish Narayanan
>> <harish.mlists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 2/16/10 9:06 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anders Logg wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:42:55AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anders Logg wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:09:31AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:49:05PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UFL 0.5.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FErari 0.2.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FFC 0.9.1
>>>>>>>>> Now released.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instant 0.9.8: Why is the buildbot failing?
>>>>>>>>> Now released.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DOLFIN 0.9.7: SCOTCH problems
>>>>>>>>> Remains to fix:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Drop Hardy support (upgrade buildbots)
>>>>>>>> This might take some time, at least for linux64-exp since I have no
>>>>>>>> control over this. I guess it will be upgraded when Lucid is out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What should we install on hardy-i386? Karmic or perhaps Lucid?
>>>>>>> I think we should choose the simplest option. I don't know what is
>>>>>>> easiest and fastest, either dropping Hardy support (which requires
>>>>>>> upgrades of buildbots and some extra administration) or adding the
>>>>>>> required #ifdefs for unordered_set/set. Garth?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't want to add ifdefs (it actually involves more than just that).
>>>>>> Harish told me yesterday that he wasn't using the standard OSX gcc (his
>>>>>> old version didn't support tr1 well), which means we could probably
>>>>>> switch back to using the tr1 unordered containers and not break Hardy or
>>>>>> standard standard OSX installations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would still suggest that we drop Hardy in the near future, perhaps
>>>>>> once Lucid is out.
>>>>>
>>>>> That seems like a good plan since Lucid is the next LTS release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you know which #ifdefs to add so we can get the buildbot green?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No ifdefs. Just change
>>>>
>>>> boost::unordered_set -> std::tr1::unordered_set
>>>> boost::unordered_map -> std::tr1::unordered_map
>>>>
>>>> and the relevant includes.
>>>
>>> This should work, except it might break the mac buildbot. While I wasn't
>>> using the most recent OS X or gcc, I think I was in line with the mac
>>> buildbot.
>>>
>>> Johannes, what does the buildbot run? Leopard or Snow Leopard, and what
>>> gcc does it use?
>>
>> I think it was Leopard and gcc 4.3 from fink. However, the mac
>> buildbot has been offline for some weeks now. We have bought a new
>> imac to be used as a dedicated mac buildbot but I haven't started to
>> install anything on it yet. I'm not sure if we should go for fink or
>> macports. Any recommendations?
>
> I suggest MacPorts. It is a bit more unstable than fink, but it allows
> for greater control and has a very recent collection of packages.
Thanks, I will look at MacPorts when I setup the new buildbot.
Johannes
Follow ups
References
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Garth N. Wells, 2010-02-12
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Anders Logg, 2010-02-15
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Johannes Ring, 2010-02-16
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Anders Logg, 2010-02-16
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Garth N. Wells, 2010-02-16
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Anders Logg, 2010-02-16
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Garth N. Wells, 2010-02-16
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Harish Narayanan, 2010-02-16
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Johannes Ring, 2010-02-16
-
Re: [Fenics] Release deadline
From: Harish Narayanan, 2010-02-16