← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: [Fenics] Release deadline

 

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:20:35PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>
>>
>> Johannes Ring wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Johannes Ring wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>> Anders Logg wrote:
>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:38:18PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> >>>>>> Anders Logg wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:29:24PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:23:33PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Harish Narayanan
>> >>>>>>>>> <harish.mlists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2/16/10 10:27 AM, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Harish Narayanan
>> >>>>>>>>>>> <harish.mlists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/16/10 9:06 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anders Logg wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:42:55AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anders Logg wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:09:31AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:49:05PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   UFL    0.5.2
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   FErari 0.2.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   FFC    0.9.1
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now released.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Instant 0.9.8: Why is the buildbot failing?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now released.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   DOLFIN  0.9.7: SCOTCH problems
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remains to fix:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  - Drop Hardy support (upgrade buildbots)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This might take some time, at least for linux64-exp since I have no
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control over this. I guess it will be upgraded when Lucid is out.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What should we install on hardy-i386? Karmic or perhaps Lucid?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should choose the simplest option. I don't know what is
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easiest and fastest, either dropping Hardy support (which requires
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrades of buildbots and some extra administration) or adding the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required #ifdefs for unordered_set/set. Garth?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want to add ifdefs (it actually involves more than just that).
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harish told me yesterday that he wasn't using the standard OSX gcc (his
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old version didn't support tr1 well), which means we could probably
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch back to using the tr1 unordered containers and not break Hardy or
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard standard OSX installations.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would still suggest that we drop Hardy in the near future, perhaps
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once Lucid is out.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That seems like a good plan since Lucid is the next LTS release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know which #ifdefs to add so we can get the buildbot green?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No ifdefs. Just change
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>   boost::unordered_set -> std::tr1::unordered_set
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>   boost::unordered_map -> std::tr1::unordered_map
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the relevant includes.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This should work, except it might break the mac buildbot. While I wasn't
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> using the most recent OS X or gcc, I think I was in line with the mac
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Johannes, what does the buildbot run? Leopard or Snow Leopard, and what
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> gcc does it use?
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think it was Leopard and gcc 4.3 from fink. However, the mac
>> >>>>>>>>>>> buildbot has been offline for some weeks now. We have bought a new
>> >>>>>>>>>>> imac to be used as a dedicated mac buildbot but I haven't started to
>> >>>>>>>>>>> install anything on it yet. I'm not sure if we should go for fink or
>> >>>>>>>>>>> macports. Any recommendations?
>> >>>>>>>>>> I suggest MacPorts. It is a bit more unstable than fink, but it allows
>> >>>>>>>>>> for greater control and has a very recent collection of packages.
>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will look at MacPorts when I setup the new buildbot.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Johannes
>> >>>>>>>> So is the conclusion that std::tr1::unordered_set will work with
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>   1. Modern operating systems
>> >>>>>>>>   2. Ubuntu Hardy
>> >>>>>>>>   3. New Mac versions (which is what we will run on the buildbot)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> ?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> If so I (or someone else) can switch to std::tr1::unordered_set.
>> >>>>>>> And the scotch/parmetis include thing needs to be fixed. Garth?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I can take a look tonight, although I haven't followed closely what the
>> >>>>>> problem is.
>> >>>>> Great. There seems to be a conflict between two versions of
>> >>>>> parmetis.h, the ParMETIS one and another installed by SCOTCH.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I think the solution is to add a scotch/ prefix in the #include
>> >>>>> and modify the include path accordingly so it doesn't pick up
>> >>>>> parmetis.h from SCOTCH when the real one is needed.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> How can I reproduce the problem? I don't see it on my machine. Sounds
>> >>>> strange that SCOTCH includes parmetis.h. Is it the compatibility
>> >>>> functions that SCOTCH provides that cause the problem?
>> >>> This is how I build SCOTCH and PT-SCOTCH on the buildbot:
>> >>>
>> >>>   wget http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/23390/scotch_5.1.7.tar.gz
>> >>>   tar zxf scotch_5.1.7.tar.gz
>> >>>   cd scotch_5.1/src
>> >>>   ln -s Make.inc/Makefile.inc.i686_pc_linux2 Makefile.inc
>> >>>   sed -i "/^CCD/s/gcc/mpicc/g" Makefile.in
>> >>>   sed -i "/^CFLAGS/s/= /= -fPIC /g" Makefile.inc
>> >>>   make
>> >>>   make ptscotch
>> >>>   cd ..
>> >>>   export SCOTCH_DIR=$PWD
>> >>>
>> >>> Then I have
>> >>>
>> >>>   ls $SCOTCH_DIR/include
>> >>>   metis.h  parmetis.h  ptscotchf.h  ptscotch.h  scotchf.h  scotch.h
>> >>>
>> >>> But it seems that if I do "make install" it won't copy metis.h and
>> >>> parmetis.h to $prefix/include so I guess that is the solution.
>> >>>
>> >> That's right. Hopefully this fixes the problem.
>> >
>> > Yes, let's hope so. I have forced a rebuild on the buildbot.
>> >
>>
>> I've just pushed a change for the unordered sets and forced a build.
>>
>> Garth
>
> Looking good so far... :-)
>
> Johannes, the output from the buildbot is somewhat confusing. It
> writes things like
>
>  *** Building dolfin *** [1/1]
>
> When I browse the output from buildbot, I always think that looks like
> an error (because of the ***). Would it be possible to change to for
> example
>
>  --- Building dolfin --- [1/1]
>
> Or perhaps it's built into the system?

Yes, it is possible, but that would be messing with JHBuild.

Johannes



Follow ups

References