dolfin team mailing list archive

[Mehdi <m.nikbakht@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Is there any specific reason why we have this type of problems in
resizing uBLAS vectors not other type of vectors? 

Note that resizing a vector becomes important in the adaptive methods.
Since when a function updates, we need to resize its underlying vector.
If we clear a vector, then we lose all data that we had there. 

Mehdi

On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 15:01 +0000, Anders Logg wrote:
> The problem was that x = Vector(b.size()) created a vector which
> sometimes contained strange numbers. This has been changed now (in
> uBLASVector::resize()) so that the vector is always zero. Took me a
> while to work through all the 29 different axpy_prod that call each
> other in operation.hpp in uBLAS...
> 
> Should be fixed now.
> 
> ** Changed in: dolfin
>        Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
>