dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #20984
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
>
> To follow the current design, we should rather have a method that
> returns whatever data is needed to create a vector, then use the
> existing factory method to actually create the vector:
>
> 1. get layout data from matrix
> 2. get factory from matrix
> 3. use factory to create vector
>
It looks like the handiest data container for (1) is the matrix itself,
though. The actual method can still be put in the factory?
(Is there a difference, design-wise, if the method resizes rather than
creates the vector?)
-j.
Follow ups
References
-
[Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Joachim Haga, 2011-01-24
-
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Johan Hake, 2011-01-24
-
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Garth N. Wells, 2011-01-24
-
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Joachim Berdal Haga, 2011-01-25
-
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Garth N. Wells, 2011-01-25
-
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Joachim Berdal Haga, 2011-01-25
-
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Garth N. Wells, 2011-01-25
-
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Joachim Berdal Haga, 2011-01-25
-
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Garth N. Wells, 2011-01-25
-
Re: [Bug 706909] [NEW] [python] matrix multiplication fails in parallel
From: Anders Logg, 2011-01-25