dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:03:41PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> On 23/02/11 16:59, Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:40:09PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 23/02/11 16:35, Anders Logg wrote:
> >>> Is it time to stop pushing so we don't make any last minute breaking
> >>> before the release?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I can stop - the pushes were somewhat related to a bug fix.
> >
> > Great! If you feel the urge to push, you can always push to
> > ~dolfin-core/dolfin/wells. ;-)
> >
> > Did you just restart the buildbots? I was going to. Anyway, let's wait
> > until they are green and then make the release.
> >
> > I can do the other releases in the meantime. Which packages need
> > release?
> >
> >   FFC     0.9.5
> >   UFC     2.0.0
> >   UFL     0.6.0 (or 1.0?)
> >   Viper   0.6.0 (or 1.0?)
> >   Instant 0.9.9 (or 1.0?)
> >
> > Since we are releasing DOLFIN 1.0 shortly, it might also be good to
> > bump the version numbers of some of the other packages. It would be
> > good to get some comments from the main authors of UFL, Viper, Instant.
> >
> > The main plan could then be to only make new releases of DOLFIN and
> > (maybe) FFC in a month. The other packages have then already be
> > released so we don't need to bother with those (unless we make bug fix
> > releases).
> >
>
> Instant needs a critical fix to allow the calling program to pass the
> SWIG executable, so I wouldn't bump it to 1.0.
>
> There are a few other significant issues that may requires changes to
> various packages, so let's not bump any version numbers just yet.

ok, except for UFC then.

How about bumping to 0.9.9 (for FFC, FIAT, Viper, UFL)?

--
Anders