dolfin team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <johan.hake@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday February 23 2011 10:35:05 Anders Logg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:26:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote:
> > On Wednesday February 23 2011 09:08:26 Anders Logg wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:03:41PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > > On 23/02/11 16:59, Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:40:09PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > > >> On 23/02/11 16:35, Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > >>> Is it time to stop pushing so we don't make any last minute
> > > > >>> breaking before the release?
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> I can stop - the pushes were somewhat related to a bug fix.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Great! If you feel the urge to push, you can always push to
> > > > > ~dolfin-core/dolfin/wells. ;-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Did you just restart the buildbots? I was going to. Anyway, let's
> > > > > wait until they are green and then make the release.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I can do the other releases in the meantime. Which packages need
> > > > > release?
> > > > > 
> > > > >   FFC     0.9.5
> > > > >   UFC     2.0.0
> > > > >   UFL     0.6.0 (or 1.0?)
> > > > >   Viper   0.6.0 (or 1.0?)
> > > > >   Instant 0.9.9 (or 1.0?)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since we are releasing DOLFIN 1.0 shortly, it might also be good to
> > > > > bump the version numbers of some of the other packages. It would be
> > > > > good to get some comments from the main authors of UFL, Viper,
> > > > > Instant.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The main plan could then be to only make new releases of DOLFIN and
> > > > > (maybe) FFC in a month. The other packages have then already be
> > > > > released so we don't need to bother with those (unless we make bug
> > > > > fix releases).
> > > > 
> > > > Instant needs a critical fix to allow the calling program to pass the
> > > > SWIG executable, so I wouldn't bump it to 1.0.
> > 
> > Agree.
> > 
> > > > There are a few other significant issues that may requires changes to
> > > > various packages, so let's not bump any version numbers just yet.
> > > 
> > > ok, except for UFC then.
> > > 
> > > How about bumping to 0.9.9 (for FFC, FIAT, Viper, UFL)?
> > 
> > I suggest bumping just one pointversion. Why should we bump all to 0.9.9?
> 
> To indicate that 1.0 is near.

No strong feelings but it really does not make sense to me.

> FFC will be 0.9.9. 

Not 0.9.5? ;)

Johan

> Then 1.0 will be released alongside DOLFIN 1.0.
> --
> Anders
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp