← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: patch for boundary indicators (e.g. VMTK) in parallel

 

I have a unit test that I can include.

BTW: A couple of issues concerning this patch.

1. I have used a std::map for a global -> local mapping. I don't know if
this
    the most efficient thing to do, but it is certainly convenient.

2. The boundary indicators are read on every process because these
    arrays are small. Their dimensions are the number of cells on the
boundary.

Kent

On 4 April 2011 10:20, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I would prefer to not apply this just yet. I'm in the process if
> re-factoring some aspects of parallel mesh functionality. Some classes
> and functions have gotten out of hand.
>
> Register a branch and a merge request so that it doesn't get forgotten.
> Unit tests are also required before patches will be applied.
>
> Garth
>
>
>
> On 04/04/11 07:52, Kent-Andre Mardal wrote:
> >
> > Please consider the attached patch.
> >
> > Kent
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> > Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>

Follow ups

References