dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #24085
Re: 1.0-beta
-
To:
dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
"Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:48 +0100
-
In-reply-to:
<20110707213513.GD2002@smaug>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Thunderbird/3.1.10
On 07/07/11 22:35, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:21:26PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:20:44PM +0200, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>>>
>>> Is the plan for 1.0-beta to fix
>>>
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ffc/+bug/787010
>>>
>>> and then release?
>>
>> Yes + decide on the interface for NonlinearVariationalProblem.
>
> Bug is fixed so we can make a release as soon as the buildbot has
> tested my branch and the fix has been merged into main, and we have
> decided on the interface for NonlinearVariationalProblem.
>
Bug fix coming, so wait a bit.
Garth
> --
> Anders
>
>
>>
>> It would be good to hear more comments on the two suggestions:
>>
>> 1. (current)
>>
>> NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, rhs, u, bcs, [J])
>>
>> This is consistent with LinearVariationalProblem and the solve()
>> functions; same order of arguments.
>>
>> 2. (Garth)
>>
>> NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, u, bcs, [J])
>>
>> This removes the unnecessary rhs argument which always has to be
>> zero.
>>
>> I think there are good arguments for both but not very strong so it's
>> a matter of taste.
>>
>> I'll try to fix bug 787010 now. I'm on vacation so I'm working slower
>> than usual.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
References