Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On 21 September 2011 11:55, Johannes Ring <johannr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 21 September 2011 11:06, Johannes Ring <johannr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> A while ago, we used some Boost MPI but then removed it because of >>>> some older systems lack support. Could we start using it now? I would >>>> like to. It would make some parallel things a lot simpler. Would the >>>> buildbots need to be updated? >>> >>> Yes, some of them would need an update. Also, we would no longer be >>> able to provide packages for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, which is by far the >>> Ubuntu version with the most downloads from the PPA. >>> >> >> OK, so the decision is whether or not to continue support for 10.04. >> Since I don't use 10.04 but I do use MPI, I vote for ditching 10.04 >> and using Boost MPI. A compromise would be to use Boost MPI, and not >> provide parallel support in the 10.04 package. >> >> How do we deal with Swig 2 in 10.04? Or is it not required since the >> wrappers have already been generated? > > I have backported SWIG 2.0 to Lucid. > OK, what about backporting Boost too? There are a few PPAs already, e.g. https://launchpad.net/~infie/+archive/boost-1.47 https://launchpad.net/~gezakovacs/+archive/boost Garth > Johannes >
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |