dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #25224
Re: Removal of constructor Function(V, x)?
On 21 Nov 2011, at 21:53, "Marie E. Rognes" <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 21. nov. 2011, at 21:52, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 08:46:13PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>> On 21 November 2011 13:07, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:55:43PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:49:42PM +0100, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20. nov. 2011, at 23:31, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is anyone using the Function constructor that takes a vector as input
>>>>>>> argument?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Function u(V, x);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it work? In parallel?
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it not work to instead use
>>>>>
>>>>> x = u.vector()
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you need it, we should keep it but add an error message that it
>>>>> doesn't work in parallel, unless it does...
>>>>
>>>> Any more input on this? There are several options:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Remove this constructor
>>>>
>>>> 2. Throw an error when running in parallel
>>>>
>>>> 3. Check that the input vector makes sense
>>>>
>>>> The last one is problematic since I don't see an easy way to perform
>>>> the check, other than calling get_local and having it fail.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't heard any reason why it can't be removed. We may need to fix
>>> assignment (re earlier discussion on assign) to just copy values and
>>> not the whole object so that a user can get the vector and then assign
>>> values to it without messing up the ghosting.
>>
>> Sounds good, but I want to wait for Marie to comment before I remove
>> it. She is using it.
>>
>> Marie? Does it work for you to use x = u.vector()?
>>
>
> Probably. However removing the constructor would be changing parts of the basic interface, which I think is a bad idea.
>
> Add a warning if you want to deprecate it later.
>
Isn't the time to make an interface change now rather than later?
Garth
> --
> Marie
>
>
>> --
>> Anders
Follow ups
References
-
Removal of constructor Function(V, x)?
From: Anders Logg, 2011-11-20
-
Re: Removal of constructor Function(V, x)?
From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-11-20
-
Re: Removal of constructor Function(V, x)?
From: Anders Logg, 2011-11-20
-
Re: Removal of constructor Function(V, x)?
From: Anders Logg, 2011-11-21
-
Re: Removal of constructor Function(V, x)?
From: Garth N. Wells, 2011-11-21
-
Re: Removal of constructor Function(V, x)?
From: Anders Logg, 2011-11-21
-
Re: Removal of constructor Function(V, x)?
From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-11-21