dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #25655
Re: [ANN] Arch Linux packages
Hi Myles,
Thanks for your instructions and sorry for the late reply. I have
added your instructions on this page:
http://fenicsproject.org/download/contributed_packages.html
Please take a look and see if it looks okay or if something is missing.
Thanks,
Johannes
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Myles English <mylesenglish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Johannes,
>
>>> On Mon, 7 May 2012 14:55:06 +0200, Johannes Ring said:
>
> > Yes, we should add that. Myles: Since I'm not familiar with the
> > package manager in Arch Linux, could you please write down the basic
> > commands one would use to install FEniCS using your packages?
>
> I should have mentioned that these are not 'official' binary packages
> and are in the Arch User Repository (AUR). A 'package' in this
> repository is really just a shell script that downloads and build the
> package locally. There are various tools for interacting with the AUR
> so I can't give specific instructions but the procedure is described
> here:
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Installing_packages
>
> The basic instructions for installing FEniCS on Arch Linux are to:
>
> 1. install from the official repos:
>
> $ sudo pacman -S bzr cmake swig boost libxml2 lapack blas python2-numpy /
> python2-scientificpython
>
> 2. build and install all these packages from the AUR in the following
> order: parmetis, metis, petsc, slepc, trilinos, instan-bzr, fiat-bzr,
> ufl-bzr, ufc-bzr, ffc-bzr, viper-bzr, dolfin-bzr, along with any
> other dependencies they may need
>
> > BTW: I have seen reports that the dolfin package does not work and
> > that it is recommended to install the dolfin-bzr package. However,
> > there does not seem to be any -bzr packages for the other FEniCS
> > components? Using DOLFIN from trunk together with the stable
> > packages will likely lead to trouble so it would be best to get the
> > dolfin 1.0.0 package working. Or, alternatively, provide -bzr
> > packages for all of the other FEniCS components and make dolfin-bzr
> > depend on those.
>
> I came to the same conclusion. It makes more sense for those running
> Arch Linux to use the latest bzr tip so I am going to orphan the
> packages that correspond with dolfin 1.0.0 (and delete them in a couple
> of weeks) and focus on the *-bzr packages I have just added.
>
> Just a technical note on dependencies: for flexibility, ffc-bzr depends
> on (e.g.) 'ufc' rather than 'ufc-bzr'. This is because ufc-bzr
> provides(ufc), as does the package ufc and the package ufc-dev. All the
> *-bzr packages are in their own group called fenics-bzr. My local
> development packages can then be in a group called fenics-dev and the
> dolfin 1.0.0 compatible package can be in the group fenics. This is
> useful because once in the hands of the Arch Linux package manager --
> pacman -- I can replace the installed package ufc-bzr with ufc-dev, for
> testing, and the dependencies are still satisfied. I haven't yet found
> a tool for interacting with the AUR that uses the group variable or
> handles the dependencies as I would like though.
>
> > Johannes
>
> For ease of managing all these packages I add them to a local pacman
> repo then the group variable becomes useful and I can look for all those
> in fenics-bzr like this: pacman -Ss fenics-bzr
>
> When this has bedded in for a while I could making binaries available
> somewhere and also release a script to do most of the downloading and
> building automatically.
>
> --
> `--[ Myles ]
Follow ups
References