dolfin team mailing list archive

[Jan Blechta <blechta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:33:29 +0200
Corrado Maurini <cmaurini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If it is the demo failing, I am just waiting for the conversion of
> the repository to git to work on it and propose some 'fix'. 

It seems done.

> 
> Perhaps it is sufficient to reduce the load, for example setting in
> the python version B  = Constant((0.0, -0.01))  # Body force per unit

As I was looking on it, I would say that python version is not even run
by regression test. That's because of wrong filenames demo_contact.py.
Regression test script picks it only if filename corresponds to demo
name:
contact-vi-foo/python/demo_contact-vi-foo.py # for foo in [snes, tao]

On the other hand C++ version needs fixing too.

> volume instead of 
> B  = Constant((0.0, -0.1))  # Body force per unit volume
> at line 36.
> 
> Let me known if and how I can propose a fix: launchpad? git?

Looks like core team is already working on bitbucket. You should:
clone master, commmit and make a pull request on bitbucket.

Jan

> 
> Corrado
> 
> Le 10 avr. 2013 à 17:16, Jan Blechta a écrit :
> 
> > On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:05:22 +0100
> > Patrick Farrell <patrick.farrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 10/04/13 15:06, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>> The PETSc SNES solver tests were passing for PETSc 3.3 but failing
> >>> for PETSc 3.2. The nonlinear solvers have been changing a lot
> >>> between PETSc versions, so I would suggest disabling the PETSc
> >>> nonlinear solvers for PETSc version < 3.3.  I have no interest in
> >>> fixing things for PETSc 3.2.
> >> 
> >> When I added the PETScSNESSolver code, I worked rather hard to make
> >> sure it worked with both PETSc 3.2 and 3.3. It's quite important to
> >> retain both. In particular, there are no released versions of
> >> ubuntu or debian that contain PETSc 3.3 packages. I think whoever
> >> broke it for 3.2 should fix it.
> > 
> > I guess it is a fail in new Corrado's demo contact-vi-snes. He
> > commented on issue in recent thread "[Dolfin] Failing regression
> > tests on buildbots" and he told that he maybe could fix it rather
> > than disable.
> > 
> > Jan
> > 
> >> 
> >> Patrick
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> >> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >