dorsal team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <johan.hake@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thursday February 3 2011 15:33:47 Harish Narayanan wrote:
> On 2/3/11 7:15 PM, Johannes Ring wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 03/02/11 17:50, Johan Hake wrote:
> >>> On Thursday February 3 2011 07:28:39 Harish Narayanan wrote:
> >>>> On 2/3/11 4:26 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>>>> On 03/02/11 15:23, Harish Narayanan wrote:
> >>>>>> On 1/27/11 11:14 AM, Harish Narayanan wrote:
> >>>>>>> I think I will just wait for DOLFIN 0.9.10 before making the next
> >>>>>>> Dorsal release, then. We now have the current results:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Fedora 13                 [untested]
> >>>>>>> Fedora 14                 [untested]
> >>>>>>> Gentoo Linux                      [untested]
> >>>>>>> Ubuntu 10.04 LTS          [64, stable - breaks on armadillo test]
> >>>>>>> Ubuntu 10.10                      [untested]
> >>>>>>> openSUSE 11.3                     [untested]
> >>>>>>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6        [untested]
> >>>>>>> Debian GNU/Linux Unstable [64, dev - OK!]
> >>>>>>> Debian GNU/Linux Testing  [untested]
> >>>>>>> Mac OS X 10.6 (with MacPorts)     [64, dev - OK!]
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Any other results? I'd like to not install too many virtual
> >>>>>> machines. ;)
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Have you updated to Swig 2.0?
> >>>> 
> >>>> No, I have not gone down that road yet. I think that will require an
> >>>> addition of Swig to all platforms, right?
> >>> 
> >>> I am not aware of any platform that ship swig 2.0 as a standard.
> >> 
> >> I that Fedora does.
> > 
> > MacPorts has 2.0.
> 
> I only now noticed this and tried it out; DOLFIN dev builds with Python
> support on Mac OS X. Will everyone interested please try their favourite
> platforms and update the following Google Doc?
> 
> http://bit.ly/euPjQe
> 
> Notes:
> 
> 1. Please restrict your testing to development builds.
> 2. If your platform's package manager doesn't give you Swig 2.0 support,
> you (may) need to remove your installed Swig and add swig to the list of
> packages in your platform file. Send a patch if you do this!

Just a note:
We still do support SWIG < 2.0, meaning that if the platform do provide 1.3.40 
but not swig 2.0 it should still work just fine!

Also swig has bumped its version to 2.0.1 now. I would recommend using this 
release. Sorry for this late update...

Johan

> Thanks,
> Harish
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dorsal
> Post to     : dorsal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dorsal
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp