dorsal team mailing list archive

[Johannes Ring <johannr@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Harish Narayanan
<harish.mlists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2/3/11 7:15 PM, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/02/11 17:50, Johan Hake wrote:
>>>> On Thursday February 3 2011 07:28:39 Harish Narayanan wrote:
>>>>> On 2/3/11 4:26 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/02/11 15:23, Harish Narayanan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/27/11 11:14 AM, Harish Narayanan wrote:
>>>>>>>> I think I will just wait for DOLFIN 0.9.10 before making the next
>>>>>>>> Dorsal release, then. We now have the current results:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fedora 13                 [untested]
>>>>>>>> Fedora 14                 [untested]
>>>>>>>> Gentoo Linux                      [untested]
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu 10.04 LTS          [64, stable - breaks on armadillo test]
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu 10.10                      [untested]
>>>>>>>> openSUSE 11.3                     [untested]
>>>>>>>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6        [untested]
>>>>>>>> Debian GNU/Linux Unstable [64, dev - OK!]
>>>>>>>> Debian GNU/Linux Testing  [untested]
>>>>>>>> Mac OS X 10.6 (with MacPorts)     [64, dev - OK!]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any other results? I'd like to not install too many virtual machines. ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you updated to Swig 2.0?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I have not gone down that road yet. I think that will require an
>>>>> addition of Swig to all platforms, right?
>>>>
>>>> I am not aware of any platform that ship swig 2.0 as a standard.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I that Fedora does.
>>
>> MacPorts has 2.0.
>
> I only now noticed this and tried it out; DOLFIN dev builds with Python
> support on Mac OS X. Will everyone interested please try their favourite
> platforms and update the following Google Doc?
>
> http://bit.ly/euPjQe

I have tested sid (64 bit) again and everything worked fine but it
seems like I can't edit the Google document. This is what I wanted to
add under Debian GNU/Linux Unstable:

  Johannes: 64-bit OK!

Johannes

>
> Notes:
>
> 1. Please restrict your testing to development builds.
> 2. If your platform's package manager doesn't give you Swig 2.0 support,
> you (may) need to remove your installed Swig and add swig to the list of
> packages in your platform file. Send a patch if you do this!
>
> Thanks,
> Harish
>