duplicity-team team mailing list archive

[Larry Gilbert <larry+launchpad@xxxxxx>]

Yes, in case I wasn't clear about it, I was thinking of "differential"
as a separate command, distinct from the coalescence(?) feature
Kenneth was talking about.  You would just use "duplicity
differential" instead of "duplicity incremental."

-- 
Larry Gilbert
Computer geekery since 1976
Sent from Del Mar, CA, United States


On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Plamen Kosseff <p.kosseff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
> So at the end the "coalesce" - "condense" will do differential backup this
> just in a complicated way
> may be we should just call it differential and leave the user to execute it
> when he wants.