duplicity-team team mailing list archive
-
duplicity-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00330
Re: [Question #118297]: Breakage after trying to restart inc backup
Question #118297 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/118297
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
This came up before. Check
https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/579958
Check if the patched version is already released and use it or simply
delete the incomplete incremental data.
..ede/duply.net
On 20.07.2010 07:11, Алексей Капранов (Alex Kapranoff) wrote:
> New question #118297 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/118297
>
> I have interrupted an inc backup. Now I cannot restart it. I get this:
>
> Last inc backup left a partial set, restarting.
> Last full backup date: Sun Nov 29 16:22:20 2009
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1241, in<module>
> with_tempdir(main)
> File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1234, in with_tempdir
> fn()
> File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1216, in main
> incremental_backup(sig_chain)
> File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 476, in incremental_backup
> assert dup_time.curtime != dup_time.prevtime, "time not moving forward at appropriate pace - system clock issues?"
> AssertionError: time not moving forward at appropriate pace - system clock issues?
>
> Looking at duplicity-bin revno 638 around line 492 I see that it dup_time.setcurtime() is caching -- it never advances cur_time after first call so the assertion can never be held. Either it's a bug or I don't understand something.
>
> You received this question notification because you are a member of
> duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
> Post to : duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity.