duplicity-team team mailing list archive
-
duplicity-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01562
Re: Python 3 yet again
With setup.py almost anything is possible, but I would be suspicious of
converting 2to3 on the fly. I think it would have to be a separate code
base and separate repositories. One code base could be possible once we
drop versions below 2.6.
...Ken
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:05 AM, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> how would you figure this? patching during setup? install different file
> versions? sounds messy.
>
> ..ede
>
> On 15.01.2013 03:29, Michael Terry wrote:
> > Hrm. OK. I wonder if we can't offer an option to 2to3 on the fly
> during setup.py if the user wants to install for python3.
> > -mt
> >
> >
> > On 14 January 2013 12:32, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:
> edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > as we don't really have hurry with that decision i vote for keeping
> an eye out how stable the next 0.6 release works out, and reconsidering a
> move to a python2.6+ duplicity 0.7 again thereafter.
> >
> > ..ede
> >
> >
> > On 14.01.2013 15:44, Michael Terry wrote:
> > > My personal push for Python 3 support is because Ubuntu is pushing
> to be able to ship only Python 3 on the desktop image. (Plus, Python 2.7
> is the last Python 2.x. We're at the end of that life line.)
> > >
> > > In that context, dropping support for Python 2.4 is important
> because it is vastly simpler to write a codebase that works in both 2.6 and
> 3.x than 2.4 and 3.x.
> > >
> > > -mt
> > >
> > >
> > > On 14 January 2013 09:43, Michael Terry <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > My personal push for Python 3 support is because Ubuntu is
> pushing to be able to ship only Python 3 on the desktop image. (Plus,
> Python 2.7 is the last Python 2.x. We're at the end of that life line.)
> > >
> > > In that context, dropping support for Python 2.4 is important
> because it is vastly simpler to write a codebase that works in both 2.6 and
> 3.x than 2.4 and 3.x.
> > >
> > > -mt
> > >
> > >
> > > On 14 January 2013 05:46, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:
> edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:
> edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > i'd limit it to data critical fixes. we simply have no man
> power to maintain both series. on the other hand, what exactly is pressing
> us to python3 or even python2.6..
> > > isn't it merely keeping an eye out not to hack something
> backwards incompatible?
> > > if so, we could simply announce that we do not strive to
> meet this criteria anymore, but still accept contributions of people or
> hack something if we feel we shouldn't exclude users with very old systems.
> > >
> > > meaning: announce 0.7 with python2.6 compatibility and
> developing it non dogmatic against it. phasing out 0.6 alltogether.
> > >
> > > ..ede
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13.01.2013 18:29, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> > > > I think we have to continue support of the 0.6 series
> for a while, open to discussion.
> > > >
> > > > As to 0.7, good idea. New features can be added here,
> fixes go to both series.
> > > >
> > > > ...Ken
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:54 AM, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx<mailto:
> edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:
> edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>> <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:
> edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:
> edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 13.01.2013 02:25, Michael Terry wrote:
> > > > > Hello! Yet another thread on the slow march to
> Python 3 support.
> > > > >
> > > > > The last place we left it was that Ubuntu was
> considering throwing some effort behind porting duplicity and maintaining
> such a patch themselves. That didn't happen for manpower reasons.
> > > > >
> > > > > But I notice that Red Hat just passed (Jan 8,
> 2013) the end of "Production 1" for RHEL 5 [1]. Which is the first
> milestone on the way to RHEL 5 end of life (which won't be fully dead until
> 2020).
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe that is the point in which duplicity
> bumped from Python 2.3 to 2.4 (the end of Production 1 for RHEL 4), right?
> > > > >
> > > > > I propose that after 0.6.21 ships, the next
> release be versioned 0.7.0 with a minimum Python of 2.6. And that we don't
> intend to make further 0.6.x releases unless we discover a data corruption
> issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > That way, we (I) can start working on patches that
> take use of 'future' imports and such with an eye towards eventually one of
> the 0.7.x releases working with Python 3 (while still keeping Python 2.6
> compatibility).
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > sounds good to me. but let's wait a bit after 0.6.21
> and decide considering the criticality of open bugs if we just do another
> 0.6 round or switch to 0.7 already.
> > > > but generally yes.
> > > >
> > > > ..ede
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team<
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team> <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team> <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> > > > Post to : duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
> > > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team<
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team> <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team> <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> > > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team> <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> > > Post to : duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team> <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> > > Post to : duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> > Post to : duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team <
> https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
> > Post to : duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
> Post to : duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References