duplicity-team team mailing list archive

[Kenneth Loafman <kenneth@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

We'll get this in for now, then discuss how best to simplify urlparse
handling.  I'm not convinced, yet, that removal of our urlparse module was
needed.  Having that in place guaranteed more stability, like pexpect.  But
then we get into the downstream packagers that remove anything that might
be a duplicate, so it's all tradeoffs.

For now, it fixes the problem.  We can always back it out.



On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:06 AM, edso <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Ken: what about the compatibility suggestion you agreed upon? ..ede
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/duplicity/py2.6.0/+merge/219113
> You are subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
>

-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/duplicity/py2.6.0/+merge/219113
Your team duplicity-team is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~mterry/duplicity/py2.6.0 into lp:duplicity.