duplicity-team team mailing list archive

[edso <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>]

fair enough :) ..ede

On 11.05.2014 13:18, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> We'll get this in for now, then discuss how best to simplify urlparse
> handling.  I'm not convinced, yet, that removal of our urlparse module was
> needed.  Having that in place guaranteed more stability, like pexpect.  But
> then we get into the downstream packagers that remove anything that might
> be a duplicate, so it's all tradeoffs.
> 
> For now, it fixes the problem.  We can always back it out.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:06 AM, edso <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Ken: what about the compatibility suggestion you agreed upon? ..ede
>> --
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/duplicity/py2.6.0/+merge/219113
>> You are subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
>>
> 

-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/duplicity/py2.6.0/+merge/219113
Your team duplicity-team is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~mterry/duplicity/py2.6.0 into lp:duplicity.