← Back to team overview

duplicity-team team mailing list archive

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Python 2.6.0 testing

 

any reason why not to file it in the public archives? ..ede

On 19.05.2014 13:13, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> Just moving the discussion back to duplicity-team.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Michael Terry <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     On 18 May 2014 13:29, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>         manual duplicity works on full, collection-status but fails on incremental call
> 
> 
>     Noted.
>      
> 
>         > The second error there looks similar, in the sense that a get() call failed to download the file.  I've seen bugs filed against 0.6.x that look similar.
>         >
> 
>         don't believe it to be a lingering bug from 0.6
>         this is reproducable only with 0.7 branch against an account that i can use properly w/ 0.6.x , reproducably ;P
> 
> 
>     My brain was thinking of bugs 1177381 and 710198.  But yeah, this error is different.
> 
>     I'll have a look later.
> 
>     -mt
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> 
> 


Follow ups

References