duplicity-team team mailing list archive

[Kenneth Loafman <kenneth@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

They all get filed somewhere.

We started with duplicity-team and this is not a topic that would hold a
lot of interest for the general user.



On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:16 AM, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> wrote:

> any reason why not to file it in the public archives? ..ede
>
> On 19.05.2014 13:13, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> > Just moving the discussion back to duplicity-team.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Michael Terry <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 18 May 2014 13:29, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:
> edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> >         manual duplicity works on full, collection-status but fails on
> incremental call
> >
> >
> >     Noted.
> >
> >
> >         > The second error there looks similar, in the sense that a
> get() call failed to download the file.  I've seen bugs filed against 0.6.x
> that look similar.
> >         >
> >
> >         don't believe it to be a lingering bug from 0.6
> >         this is reproducable only with 0.7 branch against an account
> that i can use properly w/ 0.6.x , reproducably ;P
> >
> >
> >     My brain was thinking of bugs 1177381 and 710198.  But yeah, this
> error is different.
> >
> >     I'll have a look later.
> >
> >     -mt
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Duplicity-talk mailing list
> >     Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >     https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> >
> >
>