duplicity-team team mailing list archive

[edso <question263976@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #263976 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/263976

edso proposed the following answer:
On 22.03.2015 15:41, Marco B. wrote:
> Question #263976 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/263976
> 
> Marco B. posted a new comment:
> Dear all,
> 
> thank you for your help. I ran a collection-status with verbose level 9,
> using an external drive as a temporary dir so that the operation could
> complete. I didn't run a verify because the behaviour seems to be the
> same, and a verify would take hours.
> 
> Here is a shortened version of the output log; you can find the full log
> here: http://pastebin.com/XUQBZ5da . (I managed to make it speak
> English, so this is untranslated.)
> 

nice catch, looks like the fetch routines really create two temp files.
one in 
 backend.get_fileobj_read(...)
the other in it's caller a little bit later under
 duplicity.sync_archive(...).copy_to_local(...)

will have to have a closer look to decide the necessity and come up with
a fix as probably necessary. please create a bug ticket for this and
link it to your question.

thanks ede/duply.net

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity.