duplicity-team team mailing list archive

[Domoradov Alex <question264557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #264557 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/264557

    Status: Answered => Open

Domoradov Alex is still having a problem:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.6 (Final)

# yum info duplicity
Available Packages
Name        : duplicity
Arch        : x86_64
Version     : 0.6.22
Release     : 4.el6
Size        : 533 k
Repo        : epel
Summary     : Encrypted bandwidth-efficient backup using rsync algorithm
URL         : http://www.nongnu.org/duplicity/
License     : GPLv2+

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:07 PM, edso <question264557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

> Your question #264557 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/264557
>
>     Status: Open => Answered
>
> edso proposed the following answer:
> On 15.04.2015 09:12, Domoradov Alex wrote:
> > Question #264557 on Duplicity changed:
> > https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/264557
> >
> >     Status: Answered => Open
> >
> > Domoradov Alex is still having a problem:
> > I have the same issue (SHA1 mismatch) with local backend. Now I'm testing
> > 0.7 series
>
> what was your version that created the backup?
>
> > Do I need to notify EPEL maintainer of duplicity?
> >
>
> if they promote anything older than 0.6.25 it'd make sense..
> ede/duply.net
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
>
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/264557/+confirm?answer_id=8
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/264557
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity.