duplicity-team team mailing list archive

[Howard Kaye <question631423@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #631423 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/631423

    Status: Needs information => Open

Howard Kaye gave more information on the question:
I don't think they are excess.  Maybe related to the length of the backup
chain?  In any case, the processes are coming and going.

-+= 00001 root /sbin/launchd
 \-+= 72002 root
/Library/GoogleCorpSupport/archivist/bin/gBackupd.xpc/Contents/MacOS/gBackupd
   \-+= 63036 root /Library/GoogleCorpSupport/archivist/bin/gbackup
/dev/fd/63 -u howie restore --alsologtostderr --noshow_progress
howie-macpro2 /Users/howie/restore.2017-05-09-16-38-49
     \-+- 63046 root /Library/GoogleCorpSupport/bin/python
/Library/GoogleCorpSupport/duplicity/bin/duplicity
--archive-dir=/var/gbackup/cache/howie/restore --encrypt-key=7C9301E5
--log-fd=9 --v
       |--- 63049 root /usr/local/bin/uplink-soecks
       |--- 63296 root gpg --status-fd 20 --passphrase-fd 24 --logger-fd 17
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63297 root gpg --status-fd 24 --passphrase-fd 28 --logger-fd 21
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63298 root gpg --status-fd 28 --passphrase-fd 32 --logger-fd 25
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63299 root gpg --status-fd 32 --passphrase-fd 36 --logger-fd 29
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63300 root gpg --status-fd 36 --passphrase-fd 40 --logger-fd 33
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63301 root gpg --status-fd 40 --passphrase-fd 44 --logger-fd 37
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63302 root gpg --status-fd 44 --passphrase-fd 48 --logger-fd 41
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63303 root gpg --status-fd 48 --passphrase-fd 52 --logger-fd 45
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63304 root gpg --status-fd 52 --passphrase-fd 56 --logger-fd 49
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63305 root gpg --status-fd 56 --passphrase-fd 60 --logger-fd 53
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63306 root gpg --status-fd 60 --passphrase-fd 65 --logger-fd 57
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63308 root gpg --status-fd 65 --passphrase-fd 69 --logger-fd 61
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63309 root gpg --status-fd 69 --passphrase-fd 73 --logger-fd 66
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63310 root gpg --status-fd 73 --passphrase-fd 77 --logger-fd 70
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63314 root gpg --status-fd 77 --passphrase-fd 81 --logger-fd 74
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63316 root gpg --status-fd 81 --passphrase-fd 85 --logger-fd 78
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63317 root gpg --status-fd 85 --passphrase-fd 89 --logger-fd 82
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63318 root gpg --status-fd 89 --passphrase-fd 93 --logger-fd 86
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63319 root gpg --status-fd 93 --passphrase-fd 97 --logger-fd 90
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63320 root gpg --status-fd 97 --passphrase-fd 101 --logger-fd
94 --batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       |--- 63321 root gpg --status-fd 101 --passphrase-fd 105 --logger-fd
98 --batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt
       \--- 63376 root gpg --status-fd 18 --passphrase-fd 107 --logger-fd 4
--batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt


On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Kenneth Loafman <
question631423@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Your question #631423 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/631423
>
>     Status: Open => Needs information
>
> Kenneth Loafman requested more information:
> Thanks for the fix.  I'll get it in.
>
> Did that fix the excess gpg processes as well, or is that something OS X
> specific as well?
>
> --
> To answer this request for more information, you can either reply to
> this email or enter your reply at the following page:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/631423
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>

-- 
You received this question notification because your team duplicity-team
is an answer contact for Duplicity.