ecryptfs-devel team mailing list archive

[hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Dave Kleikamp:
> > > For a regular file, the size of the upper inode is not the same as the
> > > size of the lower inode.  The lower inode includes the header blocks
> > > which are not visible in the upper inode.  So ecryptfs_interpose() will
> > > overwrite the correct upper inode size.
	:::
> It's restoring i_size to the correct value after ecryptfs_interpose
> updates it with the wrong value.

Does "ecryptfs_interpose() will overwrite the correct upper inode size"
means ecryptfs_interpose() sets a wrong value?
If so, I can understand why ecryptfs_link() sets i_size.


J. R. Okajima