ecryptfs-devel team mailing list archive
-
ecryptfs-devel team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00035
Re: Maybe a bug
Pascal Terjan wrote:
> Hi,
> line 236 of fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c looks wrong :
>
> ====
> rc = ecryptfs_find_daemon_by_euid(&old_daemon, euid, user_ns);
> if (rc != 0) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING "Received request from user [%d] "
> "to register daemon [0x%p]; unregistering daemon
> "
> "[0x%p]\n", euid, pid, old_daemon->pid);
> rc = ecryptfs_send_raw_message(ECRYPTFS_MSG_QUIT,
> old_daemon);
> ====
>
> Doesn't rc != 0 mean that it was _not_ found ?
That's correct
>
> changing it to (rc == 0) would make more sense to me
I agree, but that function (ecryptfs_process_helo) shouldn't be there
anymore. It isn't being called anywhere and should have been removed
when I pulled the netlink transport code (see commit
624ae5284516870657505103ada531c64dba2a9a), but I missed it. In the
miscdev transport, open() and close() on /dev/ecryptfs has taken the
place of the ECRYPTFS_MSG_HELO and ECRYPTFS_MSG_QUIT messages in the old
netlink transport.
I appreciate you taking a look through the code and providing feedback.
Tyler Hicks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel
> Post to : ecryptfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
References