ecryptfs team mailing list archive

[syscon-hh <syscon.kono@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils

Intrepid Ibex - last updated
Kernel 2.6.27-7-generic
Gnome-Desktop 2.24

Using the command "ecryptfs-umount-private" in an user-terminal nothing will change.
It's seeming to me a failure occures inside /usr/bin/ecryptfs-umount-private at these two lines

       count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
       if [ $count -le 1 ]; then

If I added a >!< as follows, the command is still working well

       count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
       if [ ! $count -le 1 ]; then

due to >$count< is always >2< in a single user System, but I'm not so
experienced to make the decission, what has to be rewritten.

The command "ecryptfs-mount-private" works fine!!

** Affects: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Description changed:

- Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils
- 
  Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils
  
  Intrepid Ibex - last updated
  Kernel 2.6.27-7-generic
  Gnome-Desktop 2.24
  
  Using the command "ecryptfs-umount-private" in an user-terminal nothing will change.
  It's seeming to me a failure occures inside /usr/bin/ecryptfs-umount-private at these two lines
  
         count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
         if [ $count -le 1 ]; then
  
  If I added a >!< as follows, the command is still working well
  
         count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
         if [ ! $count -le 1 ]; then
  
  due to >$count< is always >2< in a single user System, but I'm not so
  experienced to make the decission, what has be to rewritten.

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils
  
  Intrepid Ibex - last updated
  Kernel 2.6.27-7-generic
  Gnome-Desktop 2.24
  
  Using the command "ecryptfs-umount-private" in an user-terminal nothing will change.
  It's seeming to me a failure occures inside /usr/bin/ecryptfs-umount-private at these two lines
  
         count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
         if [ $count -le 1 ]; then
  
  If I added a >!< as follows, the command is still working well
  
         count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
         if [ ! $count -le 1 ]; then
  
  due to >$count< is always >2< in a single user System, but I'm not so
- experienced to make the decission, what has be to rewritten.
+ experienced to make the decission, what has to be rewritten.

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils
  
  Intrepid Ibex - last updated
  Kernel 2.6.27-7-generic
  Gnome-Desktop 2.24
  
  Using the command "ecryptfs-umount-private" in an user-terminal nothing will change.
  It's seeming to me a failure occures inside /usr/bin/ecryptfs-umount-private at these two lines
  
         count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
         if [ $count -le 1 ]; then
  
  If I added a >!< as follows, the command is still working well
  
         count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
         if [ ! $count -le 1 ]; then
  
  due to >$count< is always >2< in a single user System, but I'm not so
  experienced to make the decission, what has to be rewritten.
+ 
+ The command "ecryptfs-mount-private" works fine!!

-- 
ecryptfs-utils  "ecryptfs-umount-private" don't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of eCryptfs,
which is subscribed to ecryptfs-utils in ubuntu.

Status in “ecryptfs-utils” source package in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils

Intrepid Ibex - last updated
Kernel 2.6.27-7-generic
Gnome-Desktop 2.24

Using the command "ecryptfs-umount-private" in an user-terminal nothing will change.
It's seeming to me a failure occures inside /usr/bin/ecryptfs-umount-private at these two lines

       count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
       if [ $count -le 1 ]; then

If I added a >!< as follows, the command is still working well

       count=`who | grep "^$username " | wc -l`
       if [ ! $count -le 1 ]; then

due to >$count< is always >2< in a single user System, but I'm not so experienced to make the decission, what has to be rewritten.

The command "ecryptfs-mount-private" works fine!!