fenics team mailing list archive

["Johan Hoffman" <jhoffman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:11:02AM +0200, Johan Hoffman wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Johan Jansson wrote:
>> >> Anders Logg wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:14:50PM +0200, Johan Hoffman wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Yes, this is natural. I am all in favour of including Unicorn
>> among
>> >> the
>> >> >> fenics-apps, as you describe.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > The only difference would then be that the repository for Unicorn
>> is
>> >> > under
>> >> >
>> >> >   fenics.org/hg/unicorn
>> >> >
>> >> > instead of
>> >> >
>> >> >   fenics.org/apps/unicorn
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> But at the same time, I also think it is
>> >> >> important to keep Unicorn as a FEniCS project in itself, since it
>> is
>> >> the
>> >> >> only project aiming at realizing the FEniCS vision in the
>> direction
>> >> of
>> >> >> mathematical modeling (turbulent/laminar
>> compressible/incompressible
>> >> flow,
>> >> >> fsi, etc. as one solver).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> /Johan
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't agree. I also want to do all those things, but as part of
>> >> DOLFIN.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> I'm very positive about FEniCS Apps, and I think that Unicorn should
>> be
>> >> included as well.
>> >
>> > Good. Note that being part of FEniCS Apps is not the same thing as not
>> > being a project. Everything inq FEniCS Apps is a project. The point as
>> > I see it is to collect application-oriented projects (applications)
>> > and put up an infrastructure that allows us to add new projects at
>> > high speed with minimal resistance. If Unicorn is placed under FEniCS
>> > Apps, it would still be a project, still have a web page, still have
>> > its own repository etc, just like DOLFIN-grade2 and FEniCS Plasticity.
>>
>> Good. But then I think that essentially we are all on the same page.
>
> Finally. So do you want to move Unicorn into FEniCS Apps? The change
> would be to
>
>  (i)   Move the repository from /hg to /apps (I just need to change one
> symlink)
>  (ii)  List it on the FEniCS Apps web page
>  (iii) Edit the front page
>
> My suggestion would be to edit the front page to list first "core
> components" and then FEniCS Apps (or the other way around).
>
> Does this sound good?
>
> --
> Anders

This sounds good, to me.

/Johan


> _______________________________________________
> FEniCS-dev mailing list
> FEniCS-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-dev
>