← Back to team overview

fenics team mailing list archive

Re: Ubuntu release schedule

 

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:21:34AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:39:44PM -0400, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 21/06/10 07:53, Anders Logg wrote:
> >> > >On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:49:32AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> >> > >>On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Anders Logg<logg@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >> > >>>When should the deadline be for making the new releases?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>Is it too later if we finish by June 23rd?
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Well, it might be too late for automatic imports from Debian to
> >> > >>Ubuntu, but I can request manual imports later. It worked out fine the
> >> > >>last time. So June 23rd sounds good for me.
> >> > >
> >> > >ok, let's aim for 23rd (Wednesday this week).
> >> > >
> >> > >Anything that we need to fix before the release?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > There are quite a few bugs on Launchpad that need to be looked at.
> >>
> >> I've had some more discussions with Garth and Johannes.
> >>
> >> The plan is now to make the release on or before Thursday:
> >>
> >>   DOLFIN 0.9.8
> >>   FFC 0.9.3
> >>   UFL 0.5.3
> >>   FIAT 0.9.2
> >>   Viper 0.4.6
> >>
> >> Anything else?
> >>
> >> Please help out fixing bugs/blueprints.
> >
> > Looks to me like everything is ready for release.
> >
> > Let's keep tomorrow open for last minute fixes and then we make a
> > release on Thursday.
>
> The buildbot also reports problems with demo/mesh/refinement/python:
>
>   Traceback (most recent call last):
>     File "demo.py", line 31, in <module>
>       mesh = coarsen(mesh, cell_markers)
>   NameError: name 'coarsen' is not defined
>
> This happened in changeset 4820:
>
>   http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~dolfin-core/dolfin/main/revision/4820

I don't remember removing the coarsening function but it looks like
it's been removed. Did anyone else remove it? The quality of the
coarsening is not very good so perhaps it should be removed until we
improve it, but I would prefer keeping it an issuing a warning about
the bad quality.

--
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


References