fenics team mailing list archive

[Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 30. aug. 2010 15:53, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
> On 30 August 2010 15:26, Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> On 30. aug. 2010 15:01, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
>>     
>>> On 30 August 2010 14:41, Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> On 30. aug. 2010 14:34, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Kristian Ølgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date: 30 August 2010 14:33
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Branch ~fenics-core/fenics-doc/main] Rev 113: * Moved
>>>>> "style guides"/"before committing" paragraphs to before
>>>>> To: noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 30 August 2010 14:02,  <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> revno: 113
>>>>>> committer: Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> branch nick: fenics-doc
>>>>>> timestamp: Mon 2010-08-30 13:53:09 +0200
>>>>>> message:
>>>>>>  * Moved "style guides"/"before committing" paragraphs to before
>>>>>>    "creating patch/branch" in developer information
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  * Proof-read styleguides page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Comments:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  - This page is long. Maybe it could be split in two: a documenting
>>>>>>    code and a documenting documentation page?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> You mean the styleguide page? It's more formatting/layout than
>>>>> documenting. The first part is how the format the C++ and Python
>>>>> source code for DOLFIN, FFC, UFC, UFL etc. The second part is more of
>>>>> a quick ref for reST and how to write documentation structure, what
>>>>> directives to use and how.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Yes, I did understand that :) However, the page is still long. Could it
>>>> be split in its two parts?
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> The problem is in which toctree we should include it? I don't think we
>>> can fit more on the front page without cluttering the layout, and
>>> another 'index layer' in the styleguides is also not that elegant.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>
>> I think we can afford another index layer in the styleguides: I don't
>> think the average user will use that page everyday.  But it is not a big
>> deal for me -- so if you prefer not to -- I won't push it ;)
>>     
> I added this, I think it works better, what do you think?.
>
>   

Right now it looks very odd (File not found) Did you forget adding some
files?

--
Marie