fenics team mailing list archive

[Kristian Ølgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 30 August 2010 15:56, Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30. aug. 2010 15:53, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
>> On 30 August 2010 15:26, Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On 30. aug. 2010 15:01, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30 August 2010 14:41, Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 30. aug. 2010 14:34, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Kristian Ølgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Date: 30 August 2010 14:33
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Branch ~fenics-core/fenics-doc/main] Rev 113: * Moved
>>>>>> "style guides"/"before committing" paragraphs to before
>>>>>> To: noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 August 2010 14:02,  <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> revno: 113
>>>>>>> committer: Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> branch nick: fenics-doc
>>>>>>> timestamp: Mon 2010-08-30 13:53:09 +0200
>>>>>>> message:
>>>>>>>  * Moved "style guides"/"before committing" paragraphs to before
>>>>>>>    "creating patch/branch" in developer information
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  * Proof-read styleguides page.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Comments:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  - This page is long. Maybe it could be split in two: a documenting
>>>>>>>    code and a documenting documentation page?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean the styleguide page? It's more formatting/layout than
>>>>>> documenting. The first part is how the format the C++ and Python
>>>>>> source code for DOLFIN, FFC, UFC, UFL etc. The second part is more of
>>>>>> a quick ref for reST and how to write documentation structure, what
>>>>>> directives to use and how.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I did understand that :) However, the page is still long. Could it
>>>>> be split in its two parts?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The problem is in which toctree we should include it? I don't think we
>>>> can fit more on the front page without cluttering the layout, and
>>>> another 'index layer' in the styleguides is also not that elegant.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think we can afford another index layer in the styleguides: I don't
>>> think the average user will use that page everyday.  But it is not a big
>>> deal for me -- so if you prefer not to -- I won't push it ;)
>>>
>> I added this, I think it works better, what do you think?.
>>
>>
>
> Right now it looks very odd (File not found) Did you forget adding some
> files?

Yes, should be fixed now.

Kristian

> --
> Marie
>
>