fenics team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 04:10:00PM +0100, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
> On 3 February 2011 16:05, Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 02/03/2011 03:49 PM, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
> >
> > On 3 February 2011 15:43, Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 02/02/2011 11:40 PM, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
> >
> > On 2 February 2011 22:53, Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I realized that there are a few things about the documentation that is not
> > entirely clear to me. A couple of questions:
> >
> > - Which version of DOLFIN is the documentation on the web-site (as in the
> > programmer's references and the demo documentation) currently corresponding
> > to?
> >
> > The development version.
> >
> > A follow-up on this one. At the moment it is some development version from
> > some time back right? Since, the programmer's references are not regenerated
> > unless someone does it manually?
> >
> > Yes, that should probably be made part of the build?
> >
> > Is this (regenerating the references, copying the demos and running the demo
> > tests) easily fixable? Johannes?
>
> I think putting it in the make all rule should be enough?

Yes, that sounds good. Put as much as possible into the make script or
we will forget which scripts to run and in which order.

--
Anders