fenics team mailing list archive

[Harish Narayanan <harish.mlists@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/31/11 1:56 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:53:03PM +0200, Harish Narayanan wrote:
>> On 5/31/11 1:49 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:05:44PM +0200, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>>>> On 05/31/2011 01:04 PM, Harish Narayanan wrote:
>>>>> On 5/31/11 1:03 PM, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/31/2011 12:58 PM, noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> revno: 296
>>>>>>> committer: Harish Narayanan<hnarayanan@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> branch nick: fenics-doc
>>>>>>> timestamp: Tue 2011-05-31 12:57:19 +0200
>>>>>>> message:
>>>>>>>    Removed<h2>   as requested by Marie
>>>>>>> modified:
>>>>>>>    source/_themes/fenics/layout.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've merged fenics-doc/1.0 with fenics-doc as you might have noticed ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please push there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Done.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Great, thanks :-)
>>>
>>> What is the motivation for the merge? Luckily the cronjob that
>>> automatically pulls from fenics-doc and publishes it on the web page
>>> is not running. (And I would like to keep it so until the pages are
>>> ready for launch.)
>>>
>>> As discussed last week (with either Marie or Harish, don't remember),
>>> perhaps it is more natural now to put the web pages under fenics-web
>>> instead of fenics-doc (now that the actual docs are located in the
>>> projects)?
>>>
>>> Harish: what we will get from the designer is the main logo to be
>>> placed in the top right corner of the red banner, or perhaps the
>>> entire banner including the logo and the text "FEniCS Project" in that
>>> special font. We will also get a bunch of icons in various sizes and
>>> formats (desktop install, small thumbnail for newsitems etc), so feel
>>> free to move ahead with the design/structuring of the main page any
>>> time.
>>
>> Is this designer not providing some sort of overall look for the site as
>> well?
> 
> I have not asked for that specifically since I kind of like what we
> have now. Do you think I should ask for that as well? That may take
> more time.

Designer-like people have a knack for coming up with an overall look
based on the same vision that made the logo. So I thought it might be a
good idea to ask. We can still work on things with the current design
until then.

Harish