ffc team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:15:43PM +0200, jhoffman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> No, this is not for the stabilization. It is for applying conditions on
> surfaces, such as weak boundary conditions. But if we do the assembly over
> faces, we can take "h" to mean the "face h", so maybe this can remain
> hidden. But typically we may want to formulate a form including both
> volume and surface integrals, and then one would like to include an h_face
> in the surface integral. But as I said; this may be avoided by hiding
> "h_face" behind the regular "h". On the other hand, we have both dx and
> ds.

ok, I see your point. We could probably hide it.

Does the h on the face really have to be specific to that face? Is it
not enough to use the same h (like the diameter)?

/Anders