ffc team mailing list archive
-
ffc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00653
Re: Consolidating dolfin-swig and dolfin
Fixed. I've recompiled all the forms in DOLFIN (srcipts/compileforms)
and will run some more tests before I make the update to DOLFIN.
Can we remove the DOLFIN SWIG format?
/Anders
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:51:04PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> Very good. I'll run some more tests tomorrow and then commit the
> update.
>
> /Anders
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:48:30PM +0200, Johan Jansson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 08:17:56AM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> > > The new format breaks for some forms, in particular P5tet.form in the
> > > demo directory of FFC:
> > >
> > ...
> >
> > Ok, I didn't consider compiling just the finite element. This is fixed
> > now.
> >
> >
> > > Otherwise, the new format looks ok. If you can send a new version that
> > > can be verified to work for all FFC demos and all DOLFIN demos, I'll
> > > commit the new version right away.
> > >
> > > /Anders
> > >
> >
> > I've tested all the FFC forms and all the DOLFIN demo forms. I've also
> > run some of the demos but not all (should be put in as unit tests in
> > the future).
> >
> > I'm attaching the changesets as a bundle. Do "hg unbundle" to "pull"
> > them from the bundle. This seems to be a much better concept than
> > diffs.
> >
> > Johan
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > FFC-dev mailing list
> > FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> FFC-dev mailing list
> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
Follow ups
References